Why the most experienced executives already sense a problem and choose not to say so
THE BOTTOM LINEThe most experienced leaders in the room usually already sense when a strategy is off course. The silence that follows isn’t a failure of courage. It’s a rational, personal calculation, and it’s one that quietly costs organizations far more than the conversation it avoided.
Picture a routine executive meeting. A strategy update, a nodding room, no visible tension. By every outward signal, the team is aligned. It isn’t. Three senior leaders in that room privately believe the plan will fail. None of them say so. Two weeks before rollout, with the CEO fully invested, nobody wants to be the one who introduces friction into a decision that already has momentum. This is not a rare meeting. It is most meetings, in most organizations, and it is the starting point for change leadership consulting work with technical leaders across food and beverage: the moment when what’s known and what’s said quietly part ways.
The instinct is to read this as a courage problem. It isn’t. What a VP or technical leader is usually sitting on in that moment is not a fully built case. It’s a hunch, an uneasy read that something doesn’t add up, without the three supporting data points and the alternative plan that would make it defensible. Raising a half formed doubt against a strategy the CEO just championed spends something specific: personal capital, the standing built over years that makes a leader’s next objection worth taking seriously. If the hunch turns out to be wrong, that capital is gone for nothing. If it’s right, the credit rarely outweighs the risk taken to say it. Most days, the math favors staying quiet, because no one has made speaking up cheap enough to be worth the risk.
A hunch worth acting on rarely announces itself as certainty. It tends to keep showing up. It surfaces again in a different meeting, from a different function, framed a different way. That recurrence is the signal, and it is precisely what gets missed when an organization has no sanctioned way to name a hunch out loud before it hardens into proof.
This is not a new problem, and it is not an isolated one. Thirty years ago, Michael Beer and Russell Eisenstat identified a set of barriers to strategy execution that leaders privately recognized but rarely said aloud, among them a senior team either too controlling or too disengaged to confront what wasn’t working, and a habit of vertical communication that let information thin out on its way up. In 2025, Beer and Johanna Pregmark revisited the research and confirmed the same pattern still holds, adding a seventh barrier: an unwillingness to delegate real decision rights down into the organization. What makes this research worth citing isn’t its age. It’s that three decades of organizational change have not dislodged it. The environment has grown more brittle and less forgiving of delay, but the underlying behavior, leaders holding a known concern back from the room that could act on it, has stayed remarkably constant.
The silence itself is not neutral. Left unaddressed, it becomes a pattern the organization learns to expect.
Researchers Elizabeth Morrison and Frances Milliken gave this pattern a name in their foundational study of organizational silence: a “climate of silence,” where speaking up about a real problem comes to feel both futile and risky. Once that climate takes hold, it doesn’t stay contained to a single decision. It becomes the default setting people bring into the next one, and the one after that, until withholding a hunch is simply how the organization operates.
The Avoidance Tax isn’t paid in a single bad decision. It’s paid in every hunch nobody spent the capital to raise.
None of this calls for leaders to say more, more often, about everything. The ask is narrower and harder: to build a way for a credible hunch to be named out loud before the room settles into agreement that was never shared. The leaders who do this well aren’t the ones with the most conviction. They’re the ones who’ve made it cheap enough, and safe enough, for someone with a partial read to say so before the decision is made rather than after it’s failed.
The cost of staying quiet doesn’t show up on a balance sheet. It shows up later, in decisions that had to be unwound.
Thank you for visiting Rebel Success for Leaders
Your partner for Change Leadership Consulting and more!
Join our
Virtual Conversation
Every other month, we host a virtual conversation with leaders to share insights, challenges and strategies for implementing and operationalizing critical initiatives successfully. These conversations uncover real world challenges. Sign up to get on the distribution list!
Charlotte Allen, the Founder and CEO of Rebel Success for Leaders, a boutique services firm, partnering with Fortune 500 and mid-market organizations on enterprise-wide strategic initiatives that accelerate growth and build competitive advantage. We help leaders recognize the organizational signals that precede transformation failure and recover momentum before the costs compound. Conveniently located in the Chicago Metro area.
Learn more at rebelsuccessforleaders.com
